Moral Law According To Kant Essay -- Morality Ethics Kant Philosophy E

Moral Law According To KantImmanuel Kant was a deontologist from Germany in the eithteenth century. He believed that the only test of whether a decision is right or ill-treat is whether it could be applied to everyone. Would it be all right for everyone to do what you ar doing? If not, your decision is wrong. It would be wrong, for example, to make a promise with the intention of intermission it because if everyone did that, no one would believe anyones promises. In ethics, Kant tried to show that doing ones responsibleness consisted in following only those principles that one would accept as applying as to all. Kant objects most of all to the principle that ones own triumph can be the ground of morality. He rejects this possibility because well-being is not always relative to virtuous behavior. By this I mean that one mans well being is not always universal to all. Most significantly, Kant renounces happiness as the principle of morality because it obliterates the specific di fference between justice and vices. Universality is the form of a moral law whereby all apt beings are subject to the same condition as the basis of morality. Kant argues that in that location can be principles for action that do not admit of exceptions, and that this occurs finished practical reason. In other words, the possibility for morality does not hinge on the empirical world, but rather is a feature of the reputation of the entity that is the ground for morality. Since all rational...